Filtrar por:

A teoria da dependência 30 anos depois

1998. New dependency theory is different from the theory of imperialism, as well as from the national-bourgeois interpretation. It is “new” because rich countries are not anymore against industrialization, but favor authoritarianism and income concentration (Intervention in conference).

Brasil, sociedade nacional-dependente

2012. An overview o Brazil since the independence. An interpretation of Brazil considering the political pacts or class coalitions and the growth strategies. (Paper: Novos Estudos, Cebrap)

From the national-bourgeoisie to the dependency interpretation of Latin America

2009. Over-exploitation as well as associated dependency interpretations denied the possibility of national bourgeoisies in the region and contributed to weakening Latin American nations. Only a third version of dependency – the national-dependent interpretation – escaped this fate. Published in English in Latin American Perspectives 178, vol. 38 (3) May 2011Portuguese and French versions available. (Paper: Latin American Perspectives).

As três interpretações da dependência

2010. Over-exploitation as well as associated dependency interpretations denied the possibity of national bourgeoisies in the region and contributed to weakening Latin American nations. Only a third version of dependency – the national-dependent interpretation – escaped this fate. English and French versions available. (Paper: Perspectivas).

Amérique Latine: de la interprétation nationaliste à la interprétation par la dépendance

2009. Over-exploitation as well as associated dependency interpretations denied the possibity of national bourgeoisies in the region and contributed to weakening Latin American nations. Only a third version of dependency – the national-dependent interpretation – escaped this fate. English and Portuguese versions available. (Paper: Revue Tiers Monde).

Uma sociedade nacional-dependente

2006. Florestan Fernandes e Fernando Henrique Cardoso identified themselves with dependency theory. The former, in A Revolução Burguesa, with its Marxist “super-exploração” version, the later with the “associated dependency” version. (Preface to the 9th. edition of José Carlos Reis, As Identidades do Brasil de Varnhagen a FHC)

De la Cepal y del Iseb a la teoría de la dependencia

2006. A critique of the two dependency theories (associated and super-exploration) which intended to be an alternative to ISEBs and ECLACs view of Latin American development. Only a third version – national-dependent theory – is consistent with the nation building and growth. Portuguese and English versions available.(Paper)

Do Iseb e da Cepal à teoria da dependência

2005. A critique of the two dependency theories (associated and super-exploration) which intended to be an alternative to ISEBs and ECLACs view of Latin American development. Only a third version – national-dependent theory – is consistent with the nation building and growth. English and Spanish versions available.(Paper in edited book)

From Eclac and Iseb to dependency theory

2005. A critique of the two dependency theories (associated and super-exploration) which intended to be an alternative to ISEBs and ECLACs view of Latin American development. Only a third version – national-dependent theory – is consistent with the nation building and growth. Portuguese and Spanish versions available.(Paper)

Interpretações sobre o Brasil

1997. Update of “Seis Interpretações sobre o Brasil” (1982). It was written when the Cardoso administration was beginning. (Paper in book edited by Maria Rita Loureiro) Italian version available.

Economista ou Sociólogo do Desenvolvimento

2004. A survey of my work as an economist, sociologist, and political theorist. It includes a re-evaluation of dependency theory. Paper in the Festricht of Bresser-Pereira, Em Busca do Novo. (Paper in edited book)